If you run a restaurant, riad, or workshop in Casablanca, Rabat, Marrakech or Tangier, you've probably been pitched a fingerprint or facial-recognition reader by a hardware vendor. They look impressive on the wall. They also tend to break in summer humidity, lose their database when a power cut hits, and trigger the CNDP's data-protection regime the moment you turn them on.

QR-based attendance solves the same problem — making sure punches are who they say they are — without the hardware cost or the legal exposure. Here's the comparison nobody from the hardware side wants to walk you through:

The hidden costs of biometric readers

Why QR wins for SMEs

A QR-based kiosk is just an old phone or a cheap tablet mounted near the entrance, running a webpage that rotates a signed QR code every two minutes. Employees scan with their own phone, authenticate with a 6-digit PIN, and they're done. The first scan of the day is IN; the second is OUT. There is no biometric data stored — anywhere.

Crucially, the tampering vector that managers actually worry about — "buddy punching" — is solved differently: the platform binds the employee's phone to the employee for 60 minutes. Two people can't punch from the same device in the same shift, and one employee can't punch from two phones simultaneously. That's stronger than a fingerprint reader, which can be fooled with a silicone mold.

When to still pick biometrics

If you operate a regulated facility (defense, pharma) where employee phones aren't allowed on the floor, biometrics still make sense. For everyone else — restaurants, hotels, retail, light manufacturing, offices — QR is faster to deploy, cheaper to run, and easier on your legal team.

Want to try it? Start a 14-day free trial — your first 5 employees are free, forever.